Archive for the ‘ Technology ’ Category

What happened to technology’s little guy?

The original article can be found here± http://www.euractiv.com/infosociety/happened-technologys-little-guy-analysis-507349

The revision of the Data Protection Directive is an opportunity to harmonise the European Union’s data protection rules, allowing SMEs to take full advantage of cloud computing’s potential to save both time and money, argues Remi Caron of the Association for Competitive Technology.

Remi Caron is an enterprise (cloud) architect, entrepreneur and member of the Association for Competitive Technology (ACT). Based in the Netherlands, he has over 22 years of experience in the IT industry.

“We all love a David and Goliath story. The underdog who, through superior planning and execution, tackles the giant and wins. Such stories fascinate us in all areas of life, from the grass of the football pitch to the world of international politics. In the world of business, small technology companies have a new powerful tool they can use to compete with the giants: Cloud Computing.

Through Cloud Computing, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can save time and money by renting top-quality computer infrastructure in data centres, rather than making enormous up-front investments. Cloud computing services lower operating costs and mobility while boosting power and scalability. The future will see a genuine chance given to the smaller service provider with the better product, a more competitive marketplace that speeds innovation and gives the customer the full spectrum of choice.

There are, however, regulatory obstacles which SMEs must face before we can truly embrace the possibilities. Protection of data is vital to us all in the Internet age, with worldwide networks also offering new opportunities for those who seek to access our information for nefarious purposes.

The lack of uniformity in Data Protection rules across the 27 EU member states make them hard to navigate and SMEs do not have the legal staff to sift through the intricacies of the laws in each country. Data Protection rules must not be weakened but instead harmonised, allowing Cloud Computing networks to operate across borders in a fashion that is safe for European citizens and beneficial for European business.

An opportunity to do precisely that is just around the corner. The upcoming revision of the current Data Protection Directive presents an opportunity for the European Commission to create a favourable atmosphere for cloud-based technology throughout the EU.

Strong leadership in revising the current Data Protection Directive will help make private data safer, increase consumer confidence and allow SMEs to innovate and thrive. When this can be achieved, our technology Davids will have their sling, and we will have opened the door to improved service, standards and opportunities.”

The Cloud SPI Model Part 3: Infrastructure as a Service, the Service of Last Resort

Infrastructure-As-A-Service (IaaS) rounds out the SPI Model. For IT professionals, IaaS, especially in the form of virtual machine services, is the most familiar of Cloud offerings, it also puts the most obligation onto the company IT department. We call it the “Service of Last Resort” because while IaaS still has some of the advantages of the Cloud, it has the fewest.

Amazon EC2 is one of the original products in the IaaS space, offering the ability to build a virtual machine that runs on Amazon’s hardware. Microsoft Azure also has a virtual machine offering in this space, and there are many hosting companies like Rackspace that offer hardware transparent virtual machines.

IaaS aims lower down the stack toward the IT professional. They can build VMs for a variety of purposes, including providing infrastructure for developers. And it is far more feasible to migrate existing applications into an IaaS offering. But this flexibility comes at a price.

With IaaS, you don’t own the hardware, but from the operating system onward, you are responsible. Users of IaaS products need to worry about operating system updates, platform patches and the like – the only thing you’re not responsible for is the hardware itself.

For organizations with strong IT personnel, this isn’t that big a deal, but it is a cost and if you don’t have the skilled people available, it can be a serious problem. IaaS should be the cloud offering of last resort – you’d rather have a SaaS or PaaS product, but when that isn’t possible, IaaS is better than not being in the Cloud at all.

Recalling the tenents of OSSM: On-Demand, Self-Service, Scalable and Measured, it is far easier to violate OSSM with IaaS, especially around scalability. When you’re building your own applications on your own platform, it is easy to create non-scalable scenarios where only a single instance of the VM will operate correctly. You can make it a big VM, but you’re still confined to only one. Building applications that scale symmetrically across multiple VM instances is doable, but hard.

Ultimately building scalable applications in the IaaS world requires the same skills it would take to build scalable applications on-premise, only with more constraints – often IaaS products limit what sorts of load balancing you can do, networking and instrumentation options. The key to success with scalable applications in any environment is a close working relationship between the developers building the application and the operations people who need to run it.

Platform-As-A-Service (PaaS) actually simplifies building scalable applications by limiting the feature set available to developers and designing in scalability from the beginning. But those limitations make it very challenging to migrate an application, typically PaaS-based applications end up being greenfield implementations. But at least PaaS helps lead you to the “pit of success” for scalability – you’ll get no help from IaaS.

IaaS is more than just virtual machines – there are other services that exist in the space, especially data storage. IaaS data storage comes in a number of flavors. Amazon S3 is a simple file storage service, nothing more, nothing less. You pay for the space you consume to store your files, and fees for number of bytes uploaded and downloaded. The instrumentation isn’t fancy, but it is there. S3 follows OSSM perfectly and if it fits your requirements, it’s a great IaaS product.

Microsoft’s SQL Azure is a database-in-the-cloud solution. Microsoft considers it a PaaS offering since you don’t own the operating system, but it does blur the line between a development platform and simple infrastructure services. Under the hood SQL Azure is Microsoft SQL Server, but with some specific limitations. Not all existing SQL Server databases can be migrated to SQL Azure, especially big databases – SQL Azure tops out at 50GB.

Between the file storage of S3 and the SQL database of SQL Azure there are a number of interesting products. Amazon SimpleDB slides neatly into this space between the two, storing simple items with attributes. Google has a similar product in the space with Google Storage, and Microsoft’s Azure Table Service is similar also. All the services offer automated redundancy and Content Delivery Network (CDN) like features.

Beyond virtual machines and storage, networking services like load balancing, instrumentation, messaging queuing and the like all end up as part of an IaaS offering. When focused on the goal of delivering ultra-reliable, available-anywhere applications to your users, you’ll end up using combinations of these IaaS products.

In the real world, most organizations will end up with a combination of SaaS, PaaS and IaaS implementations. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each of the offerings is vital – in virtually every case you’d rather have SaaS over PaaS over IaaS. With SaaS, you only need to train your users on their new tool. With PaaS, you’re retraining developers as well as users. And with IaaS, you’re taking on new IT infrastructure which requires more training and additional risks.

Ultimately, in most cases the advantages of moving into the Cloud anywhere in the SPI Model are greater than than the risks – but that doesn’t mean the risks can be ignored. They are part of understanding the larger problem space of delivering great productivity tools to users.